Built with Alectryon, running Coq+SerAPI v8.20.0+0.20.0. Bubbles () indicate interactive fragments: hover for details, tap to reveal contents. Use Ctrl+↑Ctrl+↓ to navigate, Ctrl+🖱️ to focus. On Mac, use ⌘ instead of Ctrl.
[Loading ML file ssrmatching_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file ssreflect_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file ring_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
Serlib plugin: coq-elpi.elpi is not available: serlib support is missing.
Incremental checking for commands in this plugin will be impacted.
[Loading ML file coq-elpi.elpi ... done]
[Loading ML file zify_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file micromega_core_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file micromega_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file btauto_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
Notation"_ + _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ - _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ <= _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ < _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ >= _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ > _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ <= _ <= _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ < _ <= _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ <= _ < _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ < _ < _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ * _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Require Export prosa.model.task.sequentiality.Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.readiness.Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.model.task_arrivals.SectionExecutionOrder.(** Consider any type of job associated with any type of tasks... *)Context {Job: JobType}.Context {Task: TaskType}.Context `{JobTask Job Task}.(** ... with arrival times and costs ... *)Context `{JobArrival Job}.Context `{JobCost Job}.(** ... and any kind of processor state model. *)Context {PState: ProcessorState Job}.(** Consider any arrival sequence. *)Variablearr_seq : arrival_sequence Job.(** ... and any schedule of this arrival sequence ... *)Variablesched : schedule PState.(** ... in which the sequential tasks hypothesis holds. *)HypothesisH_sequential_tasks: sequential_tasks arr_seq sched.(** A simple corollary of this hypothesis is that the scheduler executes a job with the earliest arrival time. *)
exact/(negP NCOMPL)/SEQ.Qed.(** Likewise, if we see an earlier-arrived incomplete job [j1] while another job [j2] is scheduled, then [j1] and [j2] must stem from different tasks. *)
byapply/negPn/H_sequential_tasks; eauto.Qed.EndExecutionOrder.(** In the following section, we connect [sequential_readiness] with [sequential_tasks], showing that the latter follows from the former. *)SectionFromSequentialReadiness.(** Consider any type of job associated with any type of tasks ... *)Context {Job : JobType}.Context {Task : TaskType}.Context `{JobTask Job Task}.Context `{JobArrival Job}.Context `{JobCost Job}.(** ... any kind of processor state, ... *)Context {PState : ProcessorState Job}.(** ... and any arrival sequence with consistent arrivals. *)Variablearr_seq : arrival_sequence Job.HypothesisH_arrival_times_are_consistent : consistent_arrival_times arr_seq.(** If we have a sequential readiness model, ... *)Context {JR : JobReady Job PState}.HypothesisH_sequential : sequential_readiness JR arr_seq.(** ... then in any valid schedule of the arrival sequence ... *)Variablesched : schedule PState.HypothesisH_valid_schedule : valid_schedule sched arr_seq.(** ... all tasks execute sequentially. *)