Built with Alectryon, running Coq+SerAPI v8.20.0+0.20.0. Bubbles () indicate interactive fragments: hover for details, tap to reveal contents. Use Ctrl+↑Ctrl+↓ to navigate, Ctrl+🖱️ to focus. On Mac, use ⌘ instead of Ctrl.
[Loading ML file ssrmatching_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file ssreflect_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file ring_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
Serlib plugin: coq-elpi.elpi is not available: serlib support is missing.
Incremental checking for commands in this plugin will be impacted.
[Loading ML file coq-elpi.elpi ... done]
[Loading ML file zify_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file micromega_core_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file micromega_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file btauto_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
Notation"_ + _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ - _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ <= _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ < _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ >= _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ > _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ <= _ <= _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ < _ <= _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ <= _ < _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ < _ < _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ * _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Require Export prosa.model.preemption.fully_preemptive.(** * Preemptions in Fully Preemptive Model *)(** In this section, we prove that instantiation of predicate [job_preemptable] to the fully preemptive model indeed defines a valid preemption model. *)SectionFullyPreemptiveModel.(** We assume that jobs are fully preemptive. *)#[local] Existing Instancefully_preemptive_job_model.(** Consider any type of jobs. *)Context {Job : JobType}.Context `{JobArrival Job}.Context `{JobCost Job}.(** Consider any kind of processor state model, ... *)Context {PState : ProcessorState Job}.(** ... any job arrival sequence, ... *)Variablearr_seq : arrival_sequence Job.(** ... and any given schedule. *)Variablesched : schedule PState.(** Then, we prove that fully_preemptive_model is a valid preemption model. *)
byintros j ARR; repeatsplit; intros t CONTR.Qed.(** We also prove that under the fully preemptive model [job_max_nonpreemptive_segment j] is equal to 0, when [job_cost j = 0] ... *)