Built with Alectryon, running Coq+SerAPI v8.20.0+0.20.0. Bubbles () indicate interactive fragments: hover for details, tap to reveal contents. Use Ctrl+↑Ctrl+↓ to navigate, Ctrl+🖱️ to focus. On Mac, use ⌘ instead of Ctrl.
[Loading ML file ssrmatching_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file ssreflect_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file ring_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
Serlib plugin: coq-elpi.elpi is not available: serlib support is missing.
Incremental checking for commands in this plugin will be impacted.
[Loading ML file coq-elpi.elpi ... done]
[Loading ML file zify_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file micromega_core_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file micromega_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
[Loading ML file btauto_plugin.cmxs (using legacy method) ... done]
Notation"_ + _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ - _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ <= _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ < _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ >= _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ > _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ <= _ <= _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ < _ <= _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ <= _ < _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ < _ < _" was already used in scope
nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Notation"_ * _" was already used in scope nat_scope.
[notation-overridden,parsing,default]
Require Export prosa.model.task.preemption.fully_preemptive.(** * Platform for Fully Preemptive Model *)(** In this section, we prove that the instantiations of the functions [job_preemptable] and [task_max_nonpreemptive_segment] for the fully preemptive model indeed defines a valid preemption model with bounded non-preemptive regions. *)SectionFullyPreemptiveModel.(** Consider any type of tasks ... *)Context {Task : TaskType}.Context `{TaskCost Task}.(** ... and any type of jobs associated with these tasks. *)Context {Job : JobType}.Context `{JobTask Job Task}.Context `{JobArrival Job}.Context `{JobCost Job}.(** Assume that jobs and tasks are fully preemptive. *)#[local] Existing Instancefully_preemptive_job_model.#[local] Existing Instancefully_preemptive_task_model.#[local] Existing Instancefully_preemptive_rtc_threshold.(** Consider any kind of processor state model, ... *)Context {PState : ProcessorState Job}.(** ... any job arrival sequence, ... *)Variablearr_seq : arrival_sequence Job.(** ... and any given schedule. *)Variablesched : schedule PState.(** We prove that the [fully_preemptive_model] function defines a model with bounded non-preemptive regions.*)
t <= t <= t + (job_max_nonpreemptive_segment j - 1)
byapply/andP; split; [|rewrite leq_addr].Qed.(** Which together with lemma [valid_fully_preemptive_model] gives us the fact that [fully_preemptive_model] defined a valid preemption model with bounded non-preemptive regions. *)
byapply fully_preemptive_model_is_model_with_bounded_nonpreemptive_regions.Qed.EndFullyPreemptiveModel.(** We add the above lemma into a "Hint Database" basic_rt_facts, so Coq will be able to apply them automatically. *)GlobalHint Resolve
valid_fully_preemptive_model
fully_preemptive_model_is_model_with_bounded_nonpreemptive_regions
fully_preemptive_model_is_valid_model_with_bounded_nonpreemptive_segments : basic_rt_facts.