Built with Alectryon, running Coq+SerAPI v8.15.0+0.15.0. Bubbles () indicate interactive fragments: hover for details, tap to reveal contents. Use Ctrl+↑ Ctrl+↓ to navigate, Ctrl+🖱️ to focus. On Mac, use instead of Ctrl.
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "_ - _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "_ <= _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "_ < _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "_ >= _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "_ > _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "_ <= _ <= _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "_ < _ <= _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "_ <= _ < _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "_ < _ < _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope nat_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ : _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ & _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ & _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ : _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ & _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ & _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ : _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ & _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ & _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ | _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
Notation "[ rel _ _ in _ ]" was already used in scope fun_scope. [notation-overridden,parsing]
(** * Generic Processor State Interface *) (** Rather than choosing a specific schedule representation up front, we define the notion of a generic processor state, which allows us to state general definitions of core concepts (such as "how much service has a job received") that work across many possible scenarios (e.g., ideal uniprocessor schedules, schedules with overheads, variable-speed processors, multiprocessors, etc.). A concrete processor state type precisely determines how all relevant aspects of the execution environment are modeled (e.g., scheduled jobs, overheads, spinning). Here, we define just the common interface of all possible concrete processor states by means of a type class, i.e., we define a few generic functions and an invariant that must be defined for all concrete processor state types. In the most simple case (i.e., an ideal uniprocessor state—see [model/processor/ideal.v]), at any given time, either a particular job is scheduled or the processor is idle. *) Class ProcessorState (Job : JobType) := { State : Type; (** A [ProcessorState] instance provides a finite set of cores on which jobs can be scheduled. In the case of uniprocessors, this is irrelevant and may be ignored (by convention, the unit type is used as a placeholder in uniprocessor schedules, but this is not important). (Hint to the Coq novice: [finType] just means some type with finitely many values, i.e., it is possible to enumerate all cores of a multi-processor.) *) Core : finType; (** For a given processor state and core, the [scheduled_on] predicate checks whether a given job is running on the given core. *) scheduled_on : Job -> State -> Core -> bool; (** For a given processor state and core, the [service_on] function determines how much service a given job receives on the given core). *) service_on : Job -> State -> Core -> work; (** We require [scheduled_on] and [service_on] to be consistent in the sense that a job can receive service (on a given core) only if it is also scheduled (on that core). *) service_on_implies_scheduled_on : forall j s r, ~~ scheduled_on j s r -> service_on j s r = 0 }. Coercion State : ProcessorState >-> Sortclass. (** The above definition of the [ProcessorState] interface provides the predicate [scheduled_on] and the function [service_on], which relate a given job to a given core in a given state. This level of detail is required for generality, but in many situations it suffices and is more convenient to elide the information about individual cores, instead referring to all cores at once. To this end, we next define the short-hand functions [scheduled_in] and [service_in] to directly check whether a job is scheduled at all (i.e., on any core), and how much service the job receives anywhere (i.e., across all cores). *) Section ProcessorIn. (** Consider any type of jobs... *) Context {Job : JobType}. (** ...and any type of processor state. *) Context {State : ProcessorState Job}. (** For a given processor state, the [scheduled_in] predicate checks whether a given job is running on any core in that state. *) Definition scheduled_in (j : Job) (s : State) : bool := [exists c : Core, scheduled_on j s c]. (** For a given processor state, the [service_in] function determines how much service a given job receives in that state (across all cores). *) Definition service_in (j : Job) (s : State) : work := \sum_(r : Core) service_on j s r. End ProcessorIn. (** * Schedule Representation *) (** In Prosa, schedules are represented as functions, which allows us to model potentially infinite schedules. More specifically, a schedule simply maps each instant to a processor state, which reflects state of the computing platform at the specific time (e.g., which job is presently scheduled). *) Definition schedule {Job : JobType} (PState : ProcessorState Job) := instant -> PState. (** The following line instructs Coq to not let proofs use knowledge of how [scheduled_on] and [service_on] are defined. Instead, proofs must rely on basic lemmas about processor state classes. *) Global Opaque scheduled_on service_on.