# Library prosa.implementation.refinements.EDF.nonpreemptive_sched

Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.preemption.task.nonpreemptive.
Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.preemption.rtc_threshold.nonpreemptive.
Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.readiness.basic.
Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.tardiness.
Require Export prosa.implementation.facts.ideal_uni.prio_aware.
Require Export prosa.implementation.definitions.task.
Require Export prosa.implementation.priority.edf.

## Fully-Nonpreemptive Earliest-Deadline-First Schedules

In this section, we prove that the fully-nonpreemptive preemption policy under earliest-deadline-first schedules is valid, and that the scheduling policy is respected at each preemption point.
Some lemmas in this file are not novel facts; they are used to uniform POET's certificates and minimize their verbosity.
Section Schedule.
In this file, we adopt the Prosa standard implementation of jobs and tasks.
Definition Task := concrete_task : eqType.
Definition Job := concrete_job : eqType.
Consider any valid arrival sequence, ...
Variable arr_seq : arrival_sequence Job.
Hypothesis H_valid_arrivals : valid_arrival_sequence arr_seq.
... assume basic readiness, ...
Instance basic_ready_instance : JobReady Job (ideal.processor_state Job) :=
basic.basic_ready_instance.
... and consider any fully-nonpreemptive, earliest-deadline-first schedule.
#[local] Existing Instance fully_nonpreemptive_job_model.
#[local] Existing Instance EDF.
Definition sched := uni_schedule arr_seq.
First, we show that only ready jobs execute.
Lemma sched_jobs_must_be_ready_to_execute :
jobs_must_be_ready_to_execute sched.
Proof.
move⇒ j t SCHED.
apply jobs_must_be_ready ⇒ //.
- move⇒ tt ss jj IN.
rewrite /choose_highest_prio_job in IN.
by apply supremum_in in IN.
- by apply basic_readiness_nonclairvoyance.
Qed.
Next, we remark that such a schedule is valid.
Remark sched_valid :
valid_schedule sched arr_seq.
Proof.
split.
- apply np_schedule_jobs_from_arrival_sequence.
by move⇒ t ???; eapply (supremum_in (hep_job_at t)).
- by apply sched_jobs_must_be_ready_to_execute.
Qed.
Next, we show that an unfinished job scheduled at time t is always scheduled at time t+1 as well. Note that the validity of this fact also depends on which readiness model is used.
Lemma sched_nonpreemptive_next :
∀ j t,
scheduled_at sched j t →
~~ completed_by sched j t.+1 →
scheduled_at sched j t.+1.
Proof.
move⇒ j t SCHED NCOMP.
have PENDING: job_ready sched j t by apply sched_jobs_must_be_ready_to_execute.
unfold job_ready, basic_ready_instance, basic.basic_ready_instance in ×.
set chp:= choose_highest_prio_job.
have SERV_ZERO: 0 < service sched j t.+1.
{ exact: scheduled_implies_nonzero_service. }
have SERV_COST: service sched j t.+1 < job_cost j by move: NCOMP; rewrite /completed_by -ltnNge.
move: SCHED NCOMP.
rewrite !scheduled_at_def /sched /uni_schedule
/pmc_uni_schedule /generic_schedule ⇒ /eqP SCHED NCOMP.
rewrite schedule_up_to_def {1}/allocation_at ifT; first by rewrite SCHED.
rewrite /prev_job_nonpreemptive SCHED /job_preemptable /fully_nonpreemptive_job_model.
move: SERV_COST SERV_ZERO; rewrite /uni_schedule /pmc_uni_schedule /generic_schedule.
replace (_ (_ (_ _ _) _ t) j _) with (service sched j t.+1); last first.
{ rewrite /uni_schedule /pmc_uni_schedule /generic_schedule /service
/service_during /service_at.
apply eq_big_nat ⇒ i H.
replace (_ (_ _ _) _ t i) with (schedule_up_to (allocation_at arr_seq chp) None i i) ⇒ //.
by apply schedule_up_to_prefix_inclusion. }
move⇒ SERV_COST SERV_ZERO; apply /andP.
split; [|by apply /norP;split;[rewrite -lt0n|move: SERV_COST;rewrite ltn_neqAle⇒ /andP [??]]].
{ unfold job_ready, basic_ready_instance, basic.basic_ready_instance.
apply/andP; split; first by move: PENDING ⇒ /andP [ARR _]; unfold has_arrived in *; lia.
unfold completed_by in *; rewrite <- ltnNge in ×.
replace (service (_ (_ _ _) _ t) j t.+1) with
(service (fun t ⇒ schedule_up_to (allocation_at arr_seq chp) None t t) j t.+1) ⇒ //.
rewrite /service /service_during //=; apply eq_big_nat.
move⇒ t' /andP[GEQ0 LEQt]; rewrite /service_at.
replace (_ (_ _ _) _ t' t') with (schedule_up_to (allocation_at arr_seq chp) None t t') ⇒ //.
by symmetry; apply schedule_up_to_prefix_inclusion; lia. }
Qed.
Using the lemma above, we show that the schedule is nonpreemptive.
Lemma sched_nonpreemptive :
nonpreemptive_schedule (uni_schedule arr_seq).
Proof.
rewrite /nonpreemptive_schedule.
move⇒ j t; elim⇒ [|t' IHt']; first by move⇒ t'; have->: t = 0 by lia.
move⇒ LEQ SCHED NCOMP.
destruct (ltngtP t t'.+1) as [LT | _ | EQ] ⇒ //.
feed_n 3 IHt'⇒ //.
{ specialize (completion_monotonic sched j t' t'.+1) ⇒ MONO.
feed MONO; first by lia.
by apply contra in MONO. }
by apply sched_nonpreemptive_next.
Qed.
Finally, we show that the earliest-deadline-first policy is respected at each preemption point.
Lemma respects_policy_at_preemption_point_edf_np :
respects_JLFP_policy_at_preemption_point arr_seq sched (EDF Job).
Proof.
apply schedule_respects_policy ⇒ //; auto with basic_rt_facts.
by apply basic_readiness_nonclairvoyance.
Qed.
End Schedule.