# Library prosa.analysis.facts.priority.sequential

Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.always_higher_priority.

Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.work_bearing_readiness.

Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.model.preemption.

Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.work_bearing_readiness.

Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.model.preemption.

In this section, we prove that, given two jobs j1 and j2, if
job j1 arrives earlier than job j2 and j1 always has higher
priority than j2, then j2 is scheduled only after j1 is
completed.

Consider any type of jobs.

Consider any arrival sequence.

Consider a JLFP-policy that indicates a higher-or-equal priority
relation, and assume that this relation is transitive.

Next, consider any ideal uni-processor schedule of this arrival sequence, ...

... allow for any work-bearing notion of job readiness, ...

Context `{@JobReady Job (ideal.processor_state Job) Cost Arrival}.

Hypothesis H_job_ready : work_bearing_readiness arr_seq sched.

Hypothesis H_job_ready : work_bearing_readiness arr_seq sched.

... and assume that the schedule is valid.

In addition, we assume the existence of a function mapping jobs
to their preemption points ...

... and assume that it defines a valid preemption model.

Next, we assume that the schedule respects the scheduling policy at every preemption point....

... and that jobs must arrive to execute.

We show that, given two jobs j1 and j2, if job j1 arrives
earlier than job j2 and j1 always has higher priority than
j2, then j2 is scheduled only after j1 is completed.

Lemma early_hep_job_is_scheduled :

∀ j1 j2,

arrives_in arr_seq j1 →

job_arrival j1 < job_arrival j2 →

always_higher_priority j1 j2 →

∀ t,

scheduled_at sched j2 t →

completed_by sched j1 t.

End SequentialJLFP.

∀ j1 j2,

arrives_in arr_seq j1 →

job_arrival j1 < job_arrival j2 →

always_higher_priority j1 j2 →

∀ t,

scheduled_at sched j2 t →

completed_by sched j1 t.

End SequentialJLFP.