Library prosa.analysis.facts.readiness.backlogged
Require Export prosa.model.schedule.work_conserving.
Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.behavior.arrivals.
Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.readiness.
Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.behavior.arrivals.
Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.readiness.
In this file, we establish basic facts about backlogged jobs.
Consider any kind of jobs with arrival times and costs...
... and any kind of processor model, ...
... and allow for any notion of job readiness.
Given an arrival sequence and a schedule ...
... with consistent arrival times, ...
... we observe that any backlogged job is indeed in the set of backlogged
jobs.
Lemma mem_backlogged_jobs:
∀ j t,
arrives_in arr_seq j →
backlogged sched j t →
j \in jobs_backlogged_at arr_seq sched t.
Proof.
move⇒ j t ARRIVES BACKLOGGED.
rewrite /jobs_backlogged_at /arrivals_up_to.
rewrite mem_filter.
apply /andP; split; first by exact.
apply arrived_between_implies_in_arrivals ⇒ //.
rewrite /arrived_between.
apply /andP; split ⇒ //.
rewrite ltnS -/(has_arrived _ _).
now apply (backlogged_implies_arrived sched).
Qed.
∀ j t,
arrives_in arr_seq j →
backlogged sched j t →
j \in jobs_backlogged_at arr_seq sched t.
Proof.
move⇒ j t ARRIVES BACKLOGGED.
rewrite /jobs_backlogged_at /arrivals_up_to.
rewrite mem_filter.
apply /andP; split; first by exact.
apply arrived_between_implies_in_arrivals ⇒ //.
rewrite /arrived_between.
apply /andP; split ⇒ //.
rewrite ltnS -/(has_arrived _ _).
now apply (backlogged_implies_arrived sched).
Qed.
Trivially, it is also the case that any backlogged job comes from the
respective arrival sequence.
Lemma backlogged_job_arrives_in:
∀ j t,
j \in jobs_backlogged_at arr_seq sched t →
arrives_in arr_seq j.
Proof.
move⇒ j t.
rewrite /jobs_backlogged_at mem_filter ⇒ /andP [_ IN].
move: IN. rewrite /arrivals_up_to.
now apply in_arrivals_implies_arrived.
Qed.
End BackloggedJobs.
∀ j t,
j \in jobs_backlogged_at arr_seq sched t →
arrives_in arr_seq j.
Proof.
move⇒ j t.
rewrite /jobs_backlogged_at mem_filter ⇒ /andP [_ IN].
move: IN. rewrite /arrivals_up_to.
now apply in_arrivals_implies_arrived.
Qed.
End BackloggedJobs.
In the following section, we make one more crucial assumption: namely, that
the readiness model is non-clairvoyant, which allows us to relate
backlogged jobs in schedules with a shared prefix.
Consider any kind of jobs with arrival times and costs...
... any kind of processor model, ...
... and allow for any non-clairvoyant notion of job readiness.
Context {RM : JobReady Job PState}.
Hypothesis H_nonclairvoyant_job_readiness: nonclairvoyant_readiness RM.
Hypothesis H_nonclairvoyant_job_readiness: nonclairvoyant_readiness RM.
Consider any arrival sequence ...
... and two schedules ...
... with a shared prefix to a fixed horizon.
We observe that a job is backlogged at a time in the prefix in one
schedule iff it is backlogged in the other schedule due to the
non-clairvoyance of the notion of job readiness ...
Lemma backlogged_prefix_invariance:
∀ t j,
t < h →
backlogged sched j t = backlogged sched' j t.
Proof.
move⇒ t j IN_PREFIX.
rewrite /backlogged.
rewrite (H_nonclairvoyant_job_readiness sched sched' j h) //.
rewrite /scheduled_at H_shared_prefix //.
now apply ltnW.
Qed.
∀ t j,
t < h →
backlogged sched j t = backlogged sched' j t.
Proof.
move⇒ t j IN_PREFIX.
rewrite /backlogged.
rewrite (H_nonclairvoyant_job_readiness sched sched' j h) //.
rewrite /scheduled_at H_shared_prefix //.
now apply ltnW.
Qed.
As a corollary, if we further know that j is not scheduled at time h,
we can expand the previous lemma to t ≤ h.
Corollary backlogged_prefix_invariance':
∀ t j,
~~ scheduled_at sched j t →
~~ scheduled_at sched' j t →
t ≤ h →
backlogged sched j t = backlogged sched' j t.
Proof.
move⇒ t j NOT_SCHED NOT_SCHED'.
rewrite leq_eqVlt ⇒ /orP [/eqP EQ | LT]; last by apply backlogged_prefix_invariance.
rewrite /backlogged.
rewrite (H_nonclairvoyant_job_readiness sched sched' j h) //;
last by rewrite EQ.
now rewrite NOT_SCHED NOT_SCHED'.
Qed.
∀ t j,
~~ scheduled_at sched j t →
~~ scheduled_at sched' j t →
t ≤ h →
backlogged sched j t = backlogged sched' j t.
Proof.
move⇒ t j NOT_SCHED NOT_SCHED'.
rewrite leq_eqVlt ⇒ /orP [/eqP EQ | LT]; last by apply backlogged_prefix_invariance.
rewrite /backlogged.
rewrite (H_nonclairvoyant_job_readiness sched sched' j h) //;
last by rewrite EQ.
now rewrite NOT_SCHED NOT_SCHED'.
Qed.
... and also lift this observation to the set of all backlogged jobs at
any given time in the shared prefix.
Lemma backlogged_jobs_prefix_invariance:
∀ t,
t < h →
jobs_backlogged_at arr_seq sched t = jobs_backlogged_at arr_seq sched' t.
Proof.
move⇒ t IN_PREFIX.
rewrite /jobs_backlogged_at.
apply eq_filter.
rewrite /eqfun ⇒ j.
now apply backlogged_prefix_invariance.
Qed.
End NonClairvoyance.
∀ t,
t < h →
jobs_backlogged_at arr_seq sched t = jobs_backlogged_at arr_seq sched' t.
Proof.
move⇒ t IN_PREFIX.
rewrite /jobs_backlogged_at.
apply eq_filter.
rewrite /eqfun ⇒ j.
now apply backlogged_prefix_invariance.
Qed.
End NonClairvoyance.