Library prosa.analysis.facts.readiness.basic
Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.behavior.completion.
Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.readiness.
Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.work_bearing_readiness.
Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.readiness.
Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.work_bearing_readiness.
Throughout this file, we assume the basic (i.e., Liu & Layland) readiness model.
Consider any kind of jobs ...
... and any kind of processor state.
Suppose jobs have an arrival time and a cost.
The Liu & Layland readiness model is trivially non-clairvoyant.
Consider any job arrival sequence ...
... and any schedule of these jobs.
In the basic Liu & Layland model, a schedule satisfies that only ready
jobs execute as long as jobs must arrive to execute and completed jobs
don't execute, which we note with the following theorem.
Lemma basic_readiness_compliance :
jobs_must_arrive_to_execute sched →
completed_jobs_dont_execute sched →
jobs_must_be_ready_to_execute sched.
jobs_must_arrive_to_execute sched →
completed_jobs_dont_execute sched →
jobs_must_be_ready_to_execute sched.
Consider a JLFP policy that indicates a reflexive
higher-or-equal priority relation.
We show that the basic readiness model is a work-bearing
readiness model. That is, at any time instant t, if a job j
is pending, then there exists a job (namely j itself) with
higher-or-equal priority that is ready at time t.
Fact basic_readiness_is_work_bearing_readiness :
work_bearing_readiness arr_seq sched.
End LiuAndLaylandReadiness.
work_bearing_readiness arr_seq sched.
End LiuAndLaylandReadiness.
We add the above lemma into a "Hint Database" basic_facts, so Coq
will be able to apply it automatically.
Global Hint Resolve basic_readiness_is_work_bearing_readiness : basic_facts.