Library prosa.implementation.refinements.EDF.nonpreemptive_sched
Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.preemption.task.nonpreemptive.
Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.preemption.rtc_threshold.nonpreemptive.
Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.readiness.basic.
Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.tardiness.
Require Export prosa.implementation.facts.ideal_uni.prio_aware.
Require Export prosa.implementation.definitions.task.
Require Export prosa.model.priority.edf.
Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.preemption.rtc_threshold.nonpreemptive.
Require Export prosa.analysis.facts.readiness.basic.
Require Export prosa.analysis.definitions.tardiness.
Require Export prosa.implementation.facts.ideal_uni.prio_aware.
Require Export prosa.implementation.definitions.task.
Require Export prosa.model.priority.edf.
Fully-Nonpreemptive Earliest-Deadline-First Schedules
In this file, we adopt the Prosa standard implementation of jobs and tasks.
Consider any arrival sequence with consistent arrivals, ...
Variable arr_seq : arrival_sequence Job.
Hypothesis H_arrival_times_are_consistent : consistent_arrival_times arr_seq.
Hypothesis H_arrival_times_are_consistent : consistent_arrival_times arr_seq.
... assume basic readiness, ...
Instance basic_ready_instance : JobReady Job (ideal.processor_state Job) :=
basic.basic_ready_instance.
basic.basic_ready_instance.
... and consider any fully-nonpreemptive, earliest-deadline-first schedule.
#[local] Existing Instance fully_nonpreemptive_job_model.
#[local] Existing Instance EDF.
Definition sched := uni_schedule arr_seq.
#[local] Existing Instance EDF.
Definition sched := uni_schedule arr_seq.
First, we show that only ready jobs execute.
Next, we remark that such a schedule is valid.
Next, we show that an unfinished job scheduled at time t is
always scheduled at time t+1 as well. Note that the validity of
this fact also depends on which readiness model is used.
Lemma sched_nonpreemptive_next :
∀ j t,
scheduled_at sched j t →
~~ completed_by sched j t.+1 →
scheduled_at sched j t.+1.
∀ j t,
scheduled_at sched j t →
~~ completed_by sched j t.+1 →
scheduled_at sched j t.+1.
Using the lemma above, we show that the schedule is nonpreemptive.
Finally, we show that the earliest-deadline-first policy is respected
at each preemption point.