Library prosa.analysis.facts.blocking_bound.elf

Lower-Priority Non-Preemptive Segment is Bounded

In this file, we prove that, under the ELF scheduling policy, the length of the maximum non-preemptive segment of a lower-priority job (w.r.t. a job of a task tsk) is bounded by blocking_bound.
Consider any type of tasks, each characterized by a WCET task_cost, an arrival curve max_arrivals, a relative deadline task_deadline, a bound on the the task's longest non-preemptive segment task_max_nonpreemptive_segment and relative priority points, ...
  Context {Task : TaskType}.
  Context `{TaskCost Task}.
  Context `{MaxArrivals Task}.
  Context `{TaskMaxNonpreemptiveSegment Task}.
  Context `{PriorityPoint Task}.

... and any type of jobs associated with these tasks, where each job has a task job_task, a cost job_cost, and an arrival time job_arrival.
  Context {Job : JobType}.
  Context `{JobTask Job Task}.
  Context `{JobCost Job}.
  Context `{JobArrival Job}.

Consider any kind of processor state model.
  Context `{PState : ProcessorState Job}.

Consider any valid arrival sequence ...
... and any schedule of this arrival sequence.
  Variable sched : schedule PState.

We further require that a job's cost cannot exceed its task's stated WCET ...
... and assume that jobs have bounded non-preemptive segments.
Consider an arbitrary task set ts, ...
  Variable ts : seq Task.

... assume that all jobs come from the task set, ...
... and let tsk be any task in ts that is to be analyzed.
  Variable tsk : Task.
  Hypothesis H_tsk_in_ts : tsk \in ts.

Let max_arrivals be a family of arrival curves.
Consider any job j of tsk.
  Variable j : Job.
  Hypothesis H_job_of_tsk : job_of_task tsk j.

Consider an FP policy that indicates a higher-or-equal priority relation, and assume that the relation is reflexive, transitive and total.
Then, the maximum length of a nonpreemptive segment among all lower-priority jobs (w.r.t. the given job j) arrived so far is bounded by blocking_bound.
  Lemma nonpreemptive_segments_bounded_by_blocking :
     t1 t2,
      busy_interval_prefix arr_seq sched j t1 t2
      max_lp_nonpreemptive_segment arr_seq j t1 blocking_bound ts tsk (job_arrival j - t1).
  Proof.
    movet1 t2 BUSY; rewrite /max_lp_nonpreemptive_segment /blocking_bound //.
    apply: leq_trans; first by apply: max_np_job_segment_bounded_by_max_np_task_segment.
    apply /bigmax_leq_seqPj' JINB NOTHEP.
    have ARR': arrives_in arr_seq j'
      by apply: in_arrivals_implies_arrived; exact: JINB.
    apply leq_bigmax_cond_seq with (x := (job_task j')) (F := fun tsktask_max_nonpreemptive_segment tsk - 1);
      first by apply H_all_jobs_from_taskset.
    apply in_arrivals_implies_arrived_between in JINB ⇒ //.
    move: JINB; move ⇒ /andP [_ TJ'].
    have ->: (max_arrivals (job_task j') ε > 0) && (task_cost (job_task j') > 0) = true.
    { apply /andP; split.
      { apply: non_pathological_max_arrivals; last first.
        - exact: ARR'.
        - by rewrite /job_of_task.
        - by apply H_is_arrival_curve, H_all_jobs_from_taskset, ARR'. }
      { move: NOTHEP ⇒ /andP [_ NZ].
        move: (H_valid_job_cost j' ARR'); rewrite /valid_job_cost.
        by lia. } }
    { move: NOTHEP ⇒ /andP [/norP [NOTHP NOTEP] JCOST].
      rewrite ?andbT.
      move: H_job_of_tsk; rewrite /job_of_task ⇒ /eqP <-.
      case: (boolP (hep_task (job_task j') (job_task j))) ⇒ NOTHEP_Tsk'.
      { rewrite /hp_task NOTHEP_Tsk' ⇒ //=.
        rewrite andbF orFb /ep_task.
        rewrite not_hp_hep_task in NOTHP ⇒ //.
        rewrite NOTHP NOTHEP_Tsk' //=.
        rewrite NOTHEP_Tsk' Bool.andb_true_l /hep_job /GEL /job_priority_point -ltNge in NOTEP.
        have LT: ((job_arrival j)%:R + task_priority_point (job_task j)
                < (t1)%:R + task_priority_point (job_task j'))%R by lia.
        rewrite natrB; first by lia.
        move: BUSY; rewrite /busy_interval_prefix.
        move⇒ [? [? [? J_ARR]]].
        by lia. }
      { rewrite not_hep_hp_task in NOTHEP_Tsk' ⇒ //.
        by rewrite NOTHEP_Tsk'. } }
  Qed.

End MaxNPSegmentIsBounded.